![]() However, I'm under the impression that having the web components run on a different server does NOT constitute a SQL Service and therefore would NOT require a separate license. Having any SQL Service run on a separate server makes sense that it would require an additional license. And it is very expensive to have at leat 2 physical processor server for your SSRS. ![]() Really, as far as I know every server that runs any service of sql server needs separate licensing. Special Licensing Considerations for SQL Server 2005 SQL Server 2008 Pricing and Licensing Here are a couple of links that will help clarify licensing requirements. So, a remote database deployment scenario where the Report Server is installed on one server and the ReportServer database is installed on a separate server requires two licenses of SQL Server.īut don't take my word for it. In short, each server where a Business Intelligence component is installed requires a valid SQL Server license. How many licenses of SQL Server are required? In the proposed scenario, the Report Server would be installed on one server and the back end database would be installed on a separate, remote server. ![]() Recently, I was asked by a former student about licensing for a SQL Server Reporting Services instance. Per processor or per seat? Single core, dual-core, multi-core processors? Multiple instances on one server? Virtualizing servers on a single server? It can get very confusing, very quickly. Licensing models can sometimes make database modeling seem trivial.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |